Der Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co . Wargamings Panzer-MMO World of Tanks kam vor 10 Jahren heraus und ist der Leopard 1, aber erst nachdem er einen Buff bekommen hat. Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann.
Öffentlicher Test Version 1.5.1 - Anpassung der MPs: Leopard 1Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann. Wargamings Panzer-MMO World of Tanks kam vor 10 Jahren heraus und ist der Leopard 1, aber erst nachdem er einen Buff bekommen hat. Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen.
Wot Leopard 1 Buff A Skin Mod for World of Tanks VideoI Love This Tank More Than Expected! ❤ ► World of Tanks Leopard 1 Gameplay Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen. Der Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co . Wargamings Panzer-MMO World of Tanks kam vor 10 Jahren heraus und ist der Leopard 1, aber erst nachdem er einen Buff bekommen hat. Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann.
The german t10 meds cant be buffed or they will be op. Fascist tanks are not allowed to stand a chance against mighty russian tanks.
Besides that: making leopard a true sniper would be a nice id but it also should have better dispersion than t light. And buff e50m dpm to make both t10s good.
Basically increase the gun handling so you don't need to aim for 5 minutes And buff the DPM, the is the only thing it needs.
Cobra6, on 14 March - AM, said:. It would still be worse than say the Russian meds which have DPM and gun handling, but also armour.
Unless it was extreme it probably wouldn't make it better than the Cent AX either, which is an average tank but still has turret armour so is going to be more effective than a Leo and is almost as mobile, almost as accurate, has the same gun etc.
It needs buffing so its the ultimate mobile sniper, and make it stand out compared to the other NATO meds. The other buffs just make it a lot more effective sniper, able to reliable dish out bigger hits from long range at the expense of DPM.
Great to see this much opinions so far! This was also behind my reasoning for alpha suggestion. It would make corridor fights better for leopard 1 as it could trade more efficient.
Also, the ammunition Rack is stored in the front next to the driver, so it will get hit often if not careful.
On par with the tier IX M46 Patton. However, the UFP will occasionally auto-bounce. The Leopard 1 can fill two main roles to great effectiveness.
One's first thought when looking at the Leopard 1 is the role of a sniper, and it is an excellent sniper indeed. Boasting one of the most accurate guns in the game, it combines high accuracy, good alpha damage, and good DPM, all on a highly mobile, fairly well camouflaged tank.
The Leopard 1 can quickly position itself in advantageous sniping positions, positions which also often make great use of its very high m view range only the M48A5 Patton is better in this category.
All of this rolled into a single package makes it a threat from any distance, able to reliably hit weak points with its high penetration mm cannon, remain hidden while doing so, and re-position quickly to either get a new shot or retreat to a safe distance.
In this role and for the purposes of spotting, it is highly recommended to run Coated Optics, most likely in place of Vents.
The other role it excels at is that of a supporting flanker. It hasn't the armor to brawl or lead a charge on its own, but it has the acceleration, maneuverability, and top speed to quickly flank occupied tanks and shoot them in the rear with its good rate of fire.
This of course puts you more at risk for taking damage, especially module damage, so you must be careful and weigh up the risks before proceeding.
This is even more important because you need to always fully aim before taking shots to hit anything - a miss hurts due to the above average damage per shot.
Vents can be taken if one wishes but are a second class choice to due their minimal effect a 2. Another, lesser role it can fulfill to good effect is that of a scout.
With m base view range, good camo, speed, and acceleration, it can do a fine job of passive or active scouting.
However, it is large for a scout, and while the acceleration is good, it is not going to kick you up to 70kmh in a few seconds.
Making a sniper tank better at shooting one the move and less durable is crazy. Buff its pen and alpha make it crazy accurate and buff its camo rating done leopard 1 better.
They had the right idea with up its alpha the less it had to expose itself to do the same damage was nice. But overall im happy with the leo changes but PTA changes that tank is perfect please leave it alone.
Please buff the pen and dispersion back on the amx 30 b please. Idk about the stb 1 would like to test it. The lack of pen on the STB-1 and gun handling is still going to make that tank worthless, due to the fact that heavy tanks have thicker armor in the front and since WG, likes those corridor it would be hard to have a close fighter tank, then WG is going to nerf the movement on this tank, might as sell those STB-1 and go for the Swedes cause they will move faster, but hey I am a stupid player what do I know.
Maybe stop worrying about unique play styles and maybe just buff the tanks a bit. Also love how a Russian medium even talking about being nerfed brings out every Unicom saying we cant nerf there favorite tanks but if its tanks like tds that have no problem nerfing them and removing them.
Checked the amx30B, and Leo does look better. Powercreep is the wrong term, encroachment probably more accurate. Community Forum Software by IP.
Search Advanced Search section: This topic Forums. Leopard 1 needs a buff? It could use buff but power creep?
Uh no not really. Its only bad because of the cronic illness WG calls the map rotation. You could just as easily give the russian easiums a light nerf and get the same result.
We also want to properly reconfigure the entire branch and check the effects of our changes on the researchable vehicles.
So, the characteristics of the Pz. At the same time, the alpha damage of the AMX 30 B will remain average. When rebalancing the characteristics of this vehicle, we constantly kept in mind that it had no distinct playing role.
The AMX 30 B is a universal second line support vehicle, which can perform equally well in a variety of game situations.
However, it lacks accuracy and armor penetration when playing at long distances, so we decided to improve these characteristics.
However, the number of these two tanks has increased in the last six months, as well as your feedback regarding their combat performance.
Therefore, we decided to reduce some of their excessively high combat parameters. Here you have it.
Instead fix the gunhandling: aiming time down to 0. I'm kind of surprised that considering it was one of their ' promises' that they haven't got information out about the proposed buffs to the Leo 1, E, Kranvagn, IS4 and STB You'd think, if they were going for their rather standard and generic buffs it was an easy one to tick off and get done early.
The Centurion AX also has a decent turret. NeatoMan 6 Posted Jun 14 - Major. Edited by ArcticTankHunter, Jun 14 - Sign In Username or email:.